The plan to build over Sunnyside Yard, the world’s busiest rail terminal, is incredibly ambitious and complex. It would see an entire neighborhood built from scratch, totaling 140 acres. By comparison, the Hudson Yards development on Manhattan’s West Side is all of 28 acres. In fact, all of Manhattan totals only 14,478 acres, barely more than 100 times the size of the planned neighborhood above Sunnyside Yard.

So you know whatever gets built over the tracks is going to be very expensive.

But a new master plan makes one wonder if the Sunnyside Yard project is actually worth the cost, at least when it comes to affordable housing.

The plan, issued Tuesday by the city’s Economic Development Corp., says the development will include 12,000 units of housing, all of it designated affordable. But the cost of erecting a platform over the rail yard, the foundation upon which everything else will be built, is projected to be $14.4 billion. That’s $14,400,000,000. And that means each of those 12,000 homes will cost $1.2 million, before one square inch of any actual building is constructed. You can get a pretty nice house for $1.2 million in Queens as is, along with much of the rest of the city.

More affordable housing is certainly needed in the five boroughs, including here. People are losing their homes or leaving the city to avoid such a fate. And the goal of building over Sunnyside Yard is laudable: creating a whole new neighborhood of not just homes but schools, parks, libraries, stores and everything else. But $1.2 million per unit before mortar touches brick? That seems a bit cost-prohibitive, given all our aging infrastructure that needs repair.

Maybe not all the housing above Sunnyside Yard needs to be affordable. Including market-rate homes might be one way to help ensure the project itself is at all affordable.

(2) comments

Akalith

An elementary and apparently intentional mistake to give you a false premise for a thoughtless editorial: you divide the total cost of the project by 12,000 homes to come up with the pivotal point of your editorial -- pricey homes? You ignore everything else that is planned, including all the open space, school, library? All that is now merely train tracks? I lived nearby, in Sunnyside Gardens, for years, and covering the tracks with something useful for the community seems, to me, a good thing. You probably opposed Hudson Yards development, too. This is totally different from opposing Amazon's development in LIC, which would have benefited no one but real estate brokers and developers, and failing restaurants.

TommyR

It's empty space, which is at a premium in the largest city in the Western Hemisphere. My only concern is that tax-breaks are not given away to 'incentivize' the building of what will surely be Hudson Yards 2.0. I hope the residents of Sunnyside will enjoy the coming hyper-gentrification - and be prepared to pay quadruple for all the things you take for granted now! Also, remember to the thank the City when your property taxes go up.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.