Congestion pricing meetings set: MTA

The ball is now rolling on the Metropolitan Transportation Authority's plan for congestion pricing into Manhattan.

It was proposed back in the Michael Bloomberg administration, fought for since then and, some proponents claim, delayed by President Donald Trump’s Department of Transportation.

Now, seven months it received federal approval, congestion pricing will be the subject of 10 meetings the Metropolitan Transportation Authority has scheduled for those who want their say or just information about the plan, marking the start of what will be a 16-month study.

Two of the regional meetings, on Sept. 23 and Sept. 30, will include time dedicated to the specific concerns of people in Queens, though anyone may register to attend or speak at any or all of the meetings online at 

The aim is to create a tolling system that would charge drivers for entering Midtown or Downtown Manhattan either by bridge, tunnel or by crossing a yet-to-be-designated street — 60th Street, one block north of the Ed Koch Queensboro Bridge crossing, has been suggested countless times — into the Manhattan Central Business District.

The stated goals are:

• to reduce traffic congestion and vehicle exhaust pollution; and

• to raise $1 billion a year in revenue for the MTA, which the agency would use to leverage $15 billion in loans to advance its five year, $51 billion capital plan for modernization of rail and bus service.

MTA Acting Chairman and CEO Janno Lieber called the study “a crucial project for the MTA and our riders” in a press release issued  Aug. 20.

While congestion pricing was able to pass the state legislature back in 2019 when it finally got the approval offormer Gov. Andrew Cuomo, Gov. Hochul’s views had been the subject of speculation in the days leading to her swearing-in on Aug. 24.

In an email to the Chronicle on Friday afternoon, Hochul’s office included a quote from an interview with The New York Times on Aug. 25.

“I’ve supported it from its inception,” said Hochul, now the de facto head of the MTA. “I believe it has to happen for all the reasons we know congestion pricing works. But I also got to work on finding out the rollout time. I know they’re saying from 18 months to 16 months, but I want to check into that.”

She said earlier in the month that the state will have to keep an eye out to see if the Covid-19 pandemic comes into play as the plan is developed.

Opponents of the plan say it is nothing more than another tax on drivers who already fund the MTA through mandatory fees on car registrations, gasoline taxes and bridge and tunnel tolls that keep skyrocketing even as bus and subway fares have been at $2.75 per single ride since 2015.

Two of the more outspoken opponents are Assemblyman David Weprin (D-Fresh Meadows) and Councilman Barry Grodenchik (D-Oakland Gardens).

Then there is the federal Anti-Congestion Tax Act, filed Aug. 11 by U.S. Reps Josh Gottheimer (D-NJ) and Jeff Van Drew (R-NJ).

“Or as I also like to call it, the Manhattan Moocher Prevention Act,” Gottheimer said according to a transcript obtained from his official website. The congressman said it could cost a typical New Jersey commuter $3,000 per year with none of the money benefitting the Garden State or New Jersey Transit.

Gottheimer’s bill would, if passed into law, prohibit U.S. Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg from awarding any new capital investment grants to any MTA project until drivers from New Jersey are exempt from the fee if entering Manhattan via the already-toled Holland or Lincoln tunnels or the George Washington Bridge.

It also would establish a year-end federal tax credit for New Jersey drivers equal to the amount they are charged in congestion pricing tolls.

On Aug. 24, however, Hochul received a letter imploring her support, with 29 signatories including Betsy Plum of the Riders Alliance; Jean Ryan of Disabled In Action of Metropolitan NY; Mary Barber of the Environmental Defense Fund; Catherine Gray of the League of Women Voters; Julie Tighe of the New York League of Conservation Voters; Jaqi Cohen of NYPIRG Straphangers Campaign; James Whelan of the Real Estate Board of New York; Tom Wright of theRegional Plan Association; and Danny Harris of Transportation Alternatives.

The meeting schedule and geographic regions are as follow:

• Thursday, Sept. 23, 10 a.m. to noon, focusing on the Bronx, Brooklyn, Queens and Staten Island;

• Thursday, Sept. 23, 6 to 8 p.m. focusing on the Manhattan Central Business District (60th Street and below);

• Friday, Sept. 24, 10 a.m. to noon focusing on New Jersey;

• Wednesday, Sept. 29, 10 a.m. to noon focusing on northern New York City suburbs;

• Wednesday, Sept. 29, 6 to 8 p.m. focusing on Long Island;

• Thursday, Sept. 30, 6 to 8 p.m. focusing on Bronx, Brooklyn, Queens and Staten Island;

• Friday, Oct. 1, 1 to 3 p.m. focusing on Connecticut;

• Monday, Oct. 4, 6 to 8 p.m. focusing on New Jersey;

• Tuesday, Oct. 5, 6-8 p.m. focusing on  northern New York City suburbs; and

• Wednesday, Oct. 6, 6 to 8 p.m. focusing on Manhattan outside the Central Business District (61st Street and above).

(1) comment


If this article wasn't actually intended to be serious, it would be hysterical! Just another attempt to extract money from an already strapped city, who's best days are now way behind itself, thanks to two terms of the Communist Mayor DeBlasio. Again, we see those in power utilizing the false and misleading "climate change" nonsense in order to rape New Yorkers so they can fill their lavish pension coffers. Actually, their COVID ploy backfired on them. No one is coming into the city anymore, tourists are nowhere to be found, violence on the subways is out of control, and no one is riding public transportation, so what's the need for all of this gobble-de-gook, double-talk gibberish? Give it up DeBlasio - you're putting the final nail in NYC's coffin on your way out the door. And this buffoon gets up there last week at a press conference about the wonderful new ferris wheel in Times Square, or wherever the heck it was. This is what the man does with the taxpayers' money? He is a disgrace, a fraud and a failure. Need I say more?

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.