• October 24, 2014
  • Welcome!
    |
    ||
    Logout|My Dashboard

Queens Chronicle

Pride House forum slams Israeli policies

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Thursday, June 6, 2013 10:30 am | Updated: 10:41 am, Thu Jun 13, 2013.

Queens Pride House in Jackson Heights hosted its first-ever forum on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict on Tuesday night, attracting an audience of about 30 individuals, most of whom identified themselves as members of one or more Palestinian-sympathizer organizations. The event was free and open to the public.

Many in attendance indicated they were drawn to the gathering by the presence of the evening’s guest speaker, Sarah Schulman, a CUNY professor and supporter of the movement to boycott, divest from and sanction Israel.

Presided over by Pauline Park, the Pride House president and acting executive director, the forum also included a slide presentation of her 2012 trip to the region, and a question-and-answer session. Palestinian-American documentarian Nadia Awad, who filmed the trip, was an announced participant but did not appear.

The forum, to a large extent, focused on why the ongoing conflict in the Middle East is an issue for the LGBT community and the work the participants have been doing to challenge Israel’s occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem and the blockade of the Gaza Strip.

Schulman said her interest in the subject was piqued four years ago upon learning of the Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel, an economic and cultural-based movement seeking the end of collaboration with any institutions funded by the Israeli government.

She spoke of “pink-washing,” defined as the promotion of the gay friendliness of a political entity in an attempt to downplay aspects of it that are considered negative, on the part of the Israeli government. The practice, she said, “Gives a phony image of Israel.”

In 2012, she helped organize the first LGBTQ delegation tour of Palestine and invited Park to be one of the 16 participants. Delegations are a “crucial tactic” for Palestine, Schulman said. “Palestine relies on delegations.”

Park said it was “the most important trip I ever made,” other than the one which brought her here from her native Korea.

“We all agreed it was important to see for ourselves what the Israeli occupation was all about,” Park said.

The slides she showed included images of the separation barrier along the West Bank and refugee camps.

According to Park, the wall, which Israel claims is necessary to protect its civilians against acts of Palestinian terrorism, is “really about land. It makes no sense. Pieces of the wall are disconnected.”

“The term ‘settlement’ is quite a misnomer,” too, she said, indicating that many of the new buildings are quite elaborate, unlike the “Little House on the Prairie” image she suggested Israel is trying to portray.

“Israeli settlers have seized 80 percent of the water” along the West Bank, she said.

According to Park, there is “very significant discrimination against the transgendered in Israel,” suggesting that some areas of the country are safer for members of the LGBT community than others.

Speaking after the forum, she said, “Those who support Israel and engage in pink-washing claim that Israel is a paradise for LGBT people. If it’s a paradise for anyone, it would be for gay white Jewish men who are Israeli citizens living in Tel Aviv with money. For anyone else, it is far from a paradise. There is a lot of discrimination, especially against transgendered people, even in Tel Aviv.”

Asked to compare the treatment of the LGBT population in Israel with other countries in the region, she said, “It’s perfectly okay to talk about homophobia in Arabic-Muslim countries,” but suggested that “pink-washing is a ploy designed to divert our attention from the reality of Israel’s occupation which LGBT Palestinians in occupied territories have to live under. A comparison between Israel and the neighboring countries is a false comparison.”

To the audience at the forum she said, “The Israeli political system is stuck. The majority of Israelis are frustrated. Folks in this room have the power to change the situation.”

Among those on hand was Nicholas Maniace, a member of the Queens College Students Without Borders organization, who said, “The only way change will come will be by resistance against Israel. A state like Israel, the only way they listen is by opposing force.”

Sarah Wolf, a member of the International Socialist Organization, said, “It’s going to be the people on the ground that will change things. Getting the United States to withdraw support for Israel is incredibly difficult. The U.S. has a huge stake in Israel and has used Israel as a solid go-to point from which it could control that region of the world.”

Schulman suggested, “It is easier to change the U.S. than to change Israel. As Americans, we’re funding the occupation.”

To effect change, Park suggested, “people have to become aware and educate themselves on this issue,” adding that there has been “very little discussion” about it in the LGBT community. It is important, she said, for people to get the “real story,” not the “propaganda.”

She also stressed her belief that it is important to “make your views known to government officials, especially here in the United States, at the federal, state and local levels.

“The LGBT community ends up being one of the key communities in this issue,” she said, suggesting that while gay tourism is important to Israel, most LGBT people “face some degree of harassment” there.

While the Pride House sponsored the event, Park made it clear afterwards that “Queens Pride House takes no position on the issue because we want to make sure everyone feels welcome. Sponsorship is different from taking a position on an issue.”

She explained the absence of pro-Israel participants on the panel by saying, “There are forums every week of the year sponsored by pro-Israel groups, but very few where voices critical of Israel are given a chance to speak. I’m not opposed to dialogue or debate. We thought the most effective way to educate members of the LGBT community was a forum with us talking about our experiences and the conclusions we came to because of those experiences.”

The event was co-sponsored by several other groups including Adalah-NY: The New York Campaign for the Boycott of Israel, New York City Queers Against Israeli Apartheid and Queerocracy.

 

CORRECTION:

This article was corrected to reflect the proper name of one of the event's cosponsors: New York City Queers Against Israeli Apartheid. We regret the error.

More about

More about

Welcome to the discussion.

6 comments:

  • bbridges posted at 8:41 pm on Wed, Jun 12, 2013.

    bbridges Posts: 2

    Marla: Israel funds all kinds of schools, including non-sectarian schools that include people of all faiths and ethnic backgrounds. There are Israeli-only roads in the West Bank between various settlements and Israel for security reasons, but they are not Jewish only; Israeli Arabs, Druze, etc. drive on them too. The bus routes you describe were added by a private, joint Israeli-Palestinian Arab bus company to better serve Palestinians living in West Bank villages who needed to travel to work in other West Bank cities and villages or to travel into Israel.

    South Africa didn't permit blacks to attend white universities or to work in most professions. Israeli Arabs attend universities in proportion to the population at large (including Omar Bargouti, the lead proponent of BDS who is himself a student at Tel Aviv University), are doctors in hospitals, representatives to the Knesset, at all levels of law including the Supreme Court. It's disingenuous for you to pretend you don't see the difference.

     
  • marla posted at 5:03 pm on Mon, Jun 10, 2013.

    marla Posts: 0

    bbridges: explicit or implicit--when a state creates Jewish-only schools, neighborhoods, streets, bus routes, take Palestinian houses within Jerusalem if you leave to study outside the country for more than 3 years, privileges Jews even on Palestinian land, ad nauseam, the words equality, freedom, justice, democracy do NOT come to mind. But as you say we are talking about lbgt issues and you berated Brad for going off script when he mentions South Africa. Sooo, on script, Apartheid South Africa eliminated sodomy laws in 1994, while the US didn't do so until 2003. So was South Africa a gay mecca, would we correct the critics of Apartheid to say but it is good for the gays--oops, white gays, mainly men. Palestinian queers, whether in the 48 or in the West Bank cannot have an official voice in Israel. They exist for propaganda about Israel, not to be heard from. And so, I see, you do Israel's work.

     
  • Jayson posted at 4:52 pm on Mon, Jun 10, 2013.

    Jayson Posts: 0

    Brad -- Apartheid is a system of racial segregation -- Jews and Palestinians are not racial groups. If you still believe Israel is an Apartheid state, who do you reckon the Palestinian version of a "Mandela" to be?

    Let's be clear -- the issue with the anti-pinkwashing folks has very little do about pinkwashing. I truly believe that all folks, like Schulman, Park and Taylor even believe little in the whole "Israel distracts the world from the..." case as its hardly talked about in their own sessions. The main outcome and discussion for those that fight against pinkwashing is all about the end of the occupation and result of a one-state solution. Little discussion is even held of what post-one-state solution looks like for the entire Jewish population, let alone the entire LGBT population of Israel.

    I just wish the anti-pinkwashing leaders would be clear and say "my ultimate view is a one-state solution and the future is not having Israel exist at all." and then arguing with them on pinkwashing is irrelevant because you are likely not seeing eye to eye on the end result anyway.

     
  • bbridges posted at 10:17 am on Mon, Jun 10, 2013.

    bbridges Posts: 2

    Brad: South Africa had an explicit policy of Apartheid. In spite of BDS advocate's best efforts to pretend otherwise, Apartheid is not an Israeli policy. Israel's Palestinian Arab citizens enjoy equal rights, including the right to vote, observe their religions, attend the same universities as non-Arab Israelis, serve in the Knesset and the Supreme Court, etc. This doesn't sound anything like Apartheid to me.

    As far as an LBGT issue, LBGTQ Palestinians speak very openly about their situation in Israel, America, and Europe. They don't do so in Gaza or the West Bank, and I'm sure they won't be able to do so in a future Palestinian state. THAT is an LBGTQ issue.

    Finally, when Schulman and Park and other BDS proponents advocate for the end of the only Jewish state in the world when there are already 22 Arab states--all of which have abysmal records on LBGTQ issues--including one that occupies 72% of historic Palestine and is 80% Palestinian, THAT is an LBGTQ issue.

    After the Six-Day War, Israel offered to return the West Bank to Jordan and Gaza to Egypt (both had been occupying those lands since 1948), but were refused. The Palestinians continue to refuse to come to the negotiating table because they are more interested in destroying Israel than in building a state; just look at what they did when they had they got sovereignty of Gaza.

     
  • Brad Taylor posted at 9:22 am on Sun, Jun 9, 2013.

    Brad Taylor Posts: 0

    The idea that occupation and apartheid from an LGBT perspective in Palestine-Israel can only be discussed fairly if pro-Israel voices are included is a red herring. If this were the 1980-s and the apartheid situation being discussed were South Africa, would Mr. Bridges be calling for fair inclusion of the apartheid South African government? Palestinian queers speak very clearly about their positions as LGBT people in occupied Palestine and within apartheid Israel.

     
  • bbridges posted at 10:15 am on Fri, Jun 7, 2013.

    bbridges Posts: 2

    It sounds like it was a very nice evening in the anti-Israel echo chamber. Many people, including me, called on Park to include pro-Israel voices and got the same line quoted in the article. Pro-Israel events sponsored by pro-Israel political advocacy organizations are under no obligation to include anti-Israeli views. However, a community organization, sponsoring a "forum" on LBGT issues in Israel/Palestine that only includes speakers who are anti-Israel seems to me like Park is abusing her leadership position at QPH to advance her agenda.

    On the Palestinian part of the trip, participants were told to closet themselves and to not be open about being LBGTQ. Yet, they see the main LBGTQ issue in the conflict as Israel using its pro-LBGTQ record for so-called "pink washing".